2025 (6) TMI 1244
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....AMY For the Petitioner : Mr. S. Karunamoorthy For the Respondent : Mr. V. Prashanth Kiran, Government Advocate ( T ) ORDER Mr. V. Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate (Taxes), takes notice on behalf of the respondent. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order da....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... suffers from violation of principles of natural justice and is liable to be aside, as the petitioner has not been heard before passing the impugned order. 3.1. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, in the event, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter back ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....aware of the issuance of the show cause notice issued through the GST Portal and the original of the said show cause notice was not furnished to them. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the impugned assessment order came to be passed without affording any opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, confirming the proposals contained in the show cause notice. 6. No doub....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Tribunal and this Court as well. Thus, when there is no response from the tax payer to the notice sent through a particular mode, the Officer who is issuing notices should strictly explore the possibilities of sending notices through some other mode as prescribed in Section 169(1) of the Act, preferably by way of RPAD, which would ultimately achieve the object of the GST Act. 7. Therefore, this....
TaxTMI