Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (12) TMI 74

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... being aggrieved by the order dated 1-5-1995 passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, (in short CEGAT), directing the petitioner to make a pre-deposit of an amount of Rs. five lakhs on a condition precedent for entertaining the appeal of the petitioner, has preferred this writ petition seeking to challenge the said order passed by the  CEGAT on the application for st....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rding to the petitioner the actions of the respondent department in levying duty on the same goods for the second time on the petitioner amounts to double taxation and, therefore, ex facie is not leviable. 3.The learned counsel drew our attention to the memorandum of appeal filed before the CEGAT and particularly to Paragraph 6 of the same wherein the aforesaid contention was specifically raise....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orical statement that the said plea was specifically raised before the CEGAT at the time of hearing of the stay application but the same was not considered by the CEGAT. No counter-affidavit has been filed by any of the respondents in the present writ petition inspite of several opportunities afforded. The aforesaid statement of the petitioner, therefore, remains unrebutted. We have, therefore, no....