TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1995 (9) TMI 68
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....its were seized, the Collector of Customs ordered "absolute confiscation" of the seized goods, besides imposing a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- each (vide Ext. P. 4 order). Appeal preferred by them was dismissed by the Appellate Authority (Ext. P. 6 Order). They moved for revision before the Government of India, but that revision also was dismissed (Ext. P 8 order).Thereafter they filed this Original Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for quashing the above three orders. Learned Single Judge, before whom the Original Petition came up, has referred this to a larger bench. 2.Petitioners raised mainly one point which, according to their learned counsel, is fatal to the confiscation proceedings. It is based on the fact that no notice wa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....969 was considered. The Division Bench held that giving of notice as contemplated therein is not completed by sending notice. Division Bench followed the dictum of the Supreme Court in Karasimhiah v. Singri Gowda (AIR 1966 S.C. 330). It was the proviso to Section 23(9) of the Mysore Town Municipalities Act, 1951 which was considered in that decision, as per which proviso, a resolution could not be moved unless "atleast 15 days notice has been given of the intention to move the resolution." Supreme Court considered the object in giving such notice under the said provision and it was held that "giving" is complete when it was delivered to the person, or atleast when it was offered to him if he refused to accept. In the context in which the no....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hich means space. If all the seized articles are to be stored without time limit goods would pile upto unmanageable limits. So the legislature provided that if confiscation proceedings are not commenced for six months the goods should be returned to the possession of the person concerned. Commencement of confiscation proceedings is the sending of notice envisaged in Sec.124 of the Act. Hence the legislature provided that if notice is not given within six months, then possession of the seized goods should be returned. If this is the purpose of the time limit of six months, then giving of notice must be understood as a process in which despatch of the notice is equally important. 8.We may point out another distinction. The expression used ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... is given a notice in writing informing him of the grounds on which it is proposed to confiscate the goods or to impose a penalty; is given an opportunity of making a representation in writing within such reasonable time as may be specified in the notice against the grounds of confiscation or imposition of penalty mentioned therein; and is given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in the matter; Provided that the notice referred to in clause (a) and the representation referred to in clause (b) may, at the request of the person concerned, be oral." The above section provides two conditions for ordering confiscation of any goods or imposing any penalty. First condition pertains to giving notice informing him of the grounds. Se....