1995 (1) TMI 88

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner is company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. It has set up a plant at Pithampur wherein it manufactures scooters under brand name "KINETIC HONDA" falling under Chapter 87 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. This activity is being pursued in collaboration with the Japanese Company M/s Honda Motor Company. The petitioner/Company for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondents have filed the return in oppugnation. 3.I have heard both the sides. 4.The counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the order dated 8-9-1994 passed by this Court in M.P. No. 779/89 M/s. Bajaj Tempo Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. wherein similar show cause notice has been quashed. 5.The counsel for the respondents opposed the relief and attempted to support the aforesaid....