Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (1) TMI 1565

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'the CIT(A)') dated 18.10.2024, for assessment year 2016-17. 2. Shri Paritosh Jain, appearing on behalf of the assessee submits that the Assessing Officer (AO) has levied penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(her....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ettled legal principle that penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied on the addition based on estimations. 5. The above proposition has been upheld by different Hon'ble High courts, some of the decisions are as under:- (i) CIT vs. Sangrur Vanaspati Mills Ltd., 303 ITR 53(P&H); (ii) CIT vs. Krishi Tyre Retreading & Rubber Industries, 360 ITR 580(Raj.); & (iii....