2025 (6) TMI 102
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... J. Heard Shri Vishwjit, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ACSC for the State - respondents. The instant writ petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 25.09.2024 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade - 2 (Appeals), Mainpuri as well as the impugned order dated 10.05.2022 passed by the respondent no. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r. Aggrieved by the order dated 10.05.2022, the petitioner preferred appeal, which has been dismissed vide impugned order dated 25.09.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in appeal, 18.09.2024 was the date fixed, on which date the judgement was reserved and thereafter, it was delivered on 25.09.2024, to which the petitioner was not put to notice. He further submits that....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the next date. The issue in hand is squarely covered by the judgement of this Court in M/s Wonder Enterprises (supra). In view of the peculiar facts & circumstances of the case as noted above, the impugned order dated 25.09.2024 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade - 2 (Appeals), Mainpuri cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. The matters require reconsideration. For the said pu....
TaxTMI