Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1994 (10) TMI 75

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., J.]. - The controversy in this petition stands concluded by decisions of two Division Benches of this Court, to which one of us (Pendse, J.) was a party, one dated March 9, 1994 in Writ Petition No. 1835 of 1984 - 1994 (72) E.L.T. 15 (Bom.) (M/s. Chemifine and Another v. Union of India and two Others) and another reported in 1994 (71) E.L.T. 908 (Bom.) (Mehta Pharmaceutical Industries v. Union o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce and thereby altered the rates of duty chargeable in respect of manufacture of cigarettes. The petitioners claimed that the Notification was published in the Official Gazette of India and was available to the public at large only on September 3, 1985 and consequently the clearance of various quantities of cigarettes on September 2, 1985 should be on payment of rates of excise duty payable prior ....