Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (5) TMI 2025

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... alia, seeking issuance of an appropriate writ directing the Respondent No. 1 - Commissioner of Customs (Appeal), Customs House, IGI Airport to decide the appeal filed by the Petitioner assailing the Order-in-Original bearing no. 107/ADJ/2021 dated 31st March 2021 passed by the Respondent No. 2 - Joint Commissioner of Customs, Terminal-3, IGI Airport. 3. According to the Petitioner, she is a Canadian citizen, who arrived in India from Dubai on 18th August, 2019. The Petitioner, who is also a senior citizen, while travelling from Dubai to India was wearing 14 gold bangles weighing 1110 grams. The said bangles are stated to belong to the Petitioner's mother-in-law. Further, the same are stated to be very old bangles, gifted to the Petitioner....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Petitioner has appealed against this Order-in-Original before the Respondent No.1 on 25th June, 2021. 7. Further, on 17th April, 2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, it was submitted by Mr. Malhotra, ld. Counsel for the Petitioner that the hearing notice has now been received and the hearing has been fixed for 21st April, 2025. 8. The Court then, on 17th April, 2025, recorded that such a long gap in passing of the Order-in-Original and fixing of personal hearing shall, that too in a case of seizure of jewellery of a foreign resident, would be completely unacceptable. The relevant portion of the said order is extracted hereunder for ready reference: "8. Today, when the Petition was taken up for hearing, Mr. Malhotra, id. Co....