Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (5) TMI 1551

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as a business expense must be directly linked to the business activities and services rendered." 2. "On facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the brokerage expenses of Rs. 2,51,11,858/- without considering the fact that the assessee had failed to provide proof of services rendered by the brokers in relation to the sale of the flats and thus the brokerage expense in this cannot be allowed as a deduction." 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of construction and development of real estate. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act. According to the assessment order, it was noted that the assessee had debited Brokerage charges to the Profit & Loss account of Rs. 2,51,11,858/- paid to a broker at the rate of 2% of sales consideration. In response to the query in this regard by the ld.AO, the assessee submitted certain details including copies of few invoices of broker. The AO noted that the assessee had been following 'Percentage Completion Method' for accounting revenues. According to him, as per this method unless and until the completion was above 25%, the assessee did ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ge completion method adopted by it held as follows: '8. The assessee had claimed Rs. 61,78,414/- as expenditure towards brokerage and commission. The amount was paid to its brokers for booking and sale of certain properties during the assessment year. The Assessing Officer disallowed this expenditure on the ground that during the year the conveyance of the sale deeds were not executed. The CIT (A) and ITAT accepted the assessee's contentions and set aside the disallowance. At the outset, we notice that the assessee's explanation clearly stated is as follows: - "In this connection it is submitted that brokerage and commission is not a direct expenses for acquiring to a specific property but it is in fact financial cost/selling expenses and is fully allowable in the year in which the same is incurred. The property brokers who have rendered their services to obtain advances on booking of properties are entitled to the payment of commission in terms of agreement entered into with them. Therefore, the expenses incurred on brokerage and commission on booking of properties being a finance/selling expenses are allowable in full. In this connection your attenti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the project and the expenses which were not directly attributable to work in progress has been debited to Profit & Loss account. The above accounting method followed by the appellant has been also fortified by the "Guidance Note on Accounting for Real Estate Transaction" issued by the Institute of the Chartered Accountants which vide paragraph 2.2 defines the "Project Cost (i.e. which expenses shall be included while determining the project cost) and at paragraph 2.4 it has been specifically stated that: "The following cost should not be considered part of construction cost and development cost if they are material: a) General administration costs; (b) Selling cost; (c) Research and development cost; (d) Depreciation of idle plant and equipment; (e) Cost of unconsumed or uninstalled material delivered at site; and (f) Payment made to sub-contractors in advance of work performed." 9. Furthermore, in Guidance note on Accounting for Real Estate Transaction also it was stated that the general administration cost and selling cost shall not form part of work in progress. In short, the accounting treatment given in G....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The assessee had consistently been following the method of valuing its inventory in accordance with AS2. We find that Accounting Standard 2 (AS 2) provides as under: "Other costs are included in the cost of inventories only to the extent that they are incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. For example, it may be appropriate to included overheads other than production overheads or the costs of designing products for specific customers in the cost of inventories." Further, Para 13 of the AS-2 provide for some exclusions from the cost of inventories as under; "Exclusions from the Cost of Inventories : 13. In determining the cost of inventories in accordance with paragraph 6, it is appropriate to excluded certain costs and recognize them as expenses in the period in which they are incurred. Examples of such costs are : (a). abnormal amounts of wasted materials, labour, or other production costs; (b). storage costs, unless those costs are necessary in the production process prior to a further production stage; (c). administrative overheads that do not contribute to bringing the inventor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as Annexure-4) b. M/s Macrotech Construction Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT, Circle 6(3) ITA No 5283/Mum/2014. (Copy of order is enclosed as Annexure-5) 6.1. Appellant has further filed another submission dated 5/12/2024, in which it has stated that 1. "The Ld. Assessing Officer ('AO') in his order dated 31 March 2015 passed under section 143(3) of the Act has mentioned as under : "For the year under consideration the assessee had shown Nil Income from the projects taken by the assessee i.e. the assessee has not booked any income for the same means the project is still below 25% completion. In light of this fact it is seen that the assessee has submitted that it has already sold a given number of flats through brokers and incurred brokerage expense on the same. Considering this it is seen that the assessee failed to establish proof of services rendered by the brokers for the sale of the flats. Therefore, the brokerage of Rs. 2,51,11,858/- is disallowed and added back to the income of the assessee and allow to capitalization." 2. In this connection, the audited financials for the year under consideration are enclosed as Annexure 1. Upon perusal of the same, your good sel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....penses and accordingly are revenue in nature and should be debited to profit and loss account and cannot be capitalized. 7.1. I find that the primary ground for disallowance of brokerage expenses is that the appellant is following percentage completion method and had not shown any income from the project during the year under consideration. The observation made by the AO is factually incorrect because the appellant has offered a revenue of Rs. 260.19 Crores for the year under consideration, as seen in its profit and loss account. Further, on the issue of capitalization of brokerage expenses, it is evident that the said expenses were incurred as selling cost and therefore cannot be made part of work in progress. According to the IND AS 2(Inventory valuation), the administrative and selling expenses, which are not related to bringing the inventories (work-in progress) to their present location and condition are to be excluded from the Inventories being work in progress. Going by the IND AS 2, the brokerage expenses cannot be capitalized, which implies that they will have to be allowed in the year in which they are incurred. Appellant has relied upon number of judicial pronou....