1994 (4) TMI 80

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... since they involve for determination common issues and the parties are also one and the same and counsel appearing on either side are also the same. 2.W.P. No. 11725 of 1983 has been filed for a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the third-respondent and quash the order dated 8-8-1983, confirming the order of the second-respondent dated 21-8-1981. Under the orders of the Collector of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....refund granted to the petitioner. The excess refund came to be made on a misunderstanding of the actual version to be taken into account for purposes of assessment of duty. The impugned order directing the petitioner to remit back the excess refund made was on the view that a difference between the duty actually collected by the appellant from the customers and the duty actually paid by them to th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3], which was by a Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court and an order of mine dated 17-11-1992 in W.P. No. 567 of 1984, as completely answering the challenge on both the grounds raised before this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner cannot dispute the position that the ratio of the decision of the Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court and my earlier decision squarely cover both the issues ....