1994 (3) TMI 98

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... narrow compass. The petitioners filed an application for refund of duty alleged to be paid in excess, in respect of manufacture of the goods covered under Tariff Item No. 68. The Assistant Collector rejected the claim. The petitioners preferred appeal before the Appellate Collector and appeal was decided in favour of the petitioners. The order passed by the Appellate Authority was challenged by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellate Court. 3. The appeal preferred by the Department before the CEGAT succeeded and order of refund was set aside, but the proceedings were remitted back to the Assistant Collector for fresh disposal. After remand, the Assistant Collector dismissed the claim for refund by order dated January 17, 1989. 4. Mr. Mehta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, submitted that in ....