TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (5) TMI 1267
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssued by the Department of Trade and Taxes, GNCTD, pertaining to the Financial Year 2019-20, as also the consequent order dated 28th August, 2024 passed by the office of Sales Tax Officer Class II/ AVATO, Delhi (hereinafter, 'the impugned order'). 3. The petition also challenges the vires of Notification No. 9/2023-Central Tax dated 31st March, 2023 and Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28th December, 2023 as also the Notification No. 9/2023-State Tax dated 22nd June, 2023 and Notification No. 56/2023-State Tax dated 11th July, 2024 (hereinafter 'impugned notifications'). 4. The validity of the impugned notifications was under consideration before this Court in a batch of petitions with the lead petition being W.P.(C) 16499/2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eas, the Guwahati High Court has quashed Notification No. 56 of 2023 (Central Tax). 6. The Telangana High Court while not delving into the vires of the assailed notifications, made certain observations in respect of invalidity of Notification No. 56 of 2023 (Central Tax). This judgment of the Telangana High Court is now presently under consideration by the Supreme Court in S.L.P No 4240/2025 titled M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors. The Supreme Court vide order dated 21st February, 2025, passed the following order in the said case: "1. The subject matter of challenge before the High Court was to the legality, validity and propriety of the Notification No.13/2022 dated 5-7-2022 & Notificat....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....5. Almost all the issues, which have been raised before us in these present connected cases and have been noticed hereinabove, are the subject matter of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid SLP. 66. Keeping in view the judicial discipline, we refrain from giving our opinion with respect to the vires of Section 168-A of the Act as well as the notifications issued in purported exercise of power under Section 168-A of the Act which have been challenged, and we direct that all these present connected cases shall be governed by the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the decision thereto shall be binding on these cases too. 67. Since the matter is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the inte....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....permitted to be pursued by the Petitioners, without delving into the question of the validity of the said notifications at this stage. 11. The said categories and proposed reliefs have been broadly put to the parties today. They may seek instructions and revert by tomorrow i.e., 23rd April, 2025." 5. Thereafter, on 23rd April, 2025, this Court, having noted that the validity of the impugned notifications is under consideration before the Supreme Court, had disposed of several matters in the said batch of petitions after addressing other factual issues raised in the respective petitions. Additionally, while disposing of the said petitions, this Court clearly observed that the validity of the impugned notifications therein shall b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....22,40,138 (Inclusive of GST) in FY 2019-20 from the party named Singh Trading Co, Chawla Trader, Perfect Overseas, Satguru Impex, Guru Dev Impex., K S G M Steel Industries, Shri Ganesh Traders, Frontier Electricals. mentioned in the notice, the said credit is available in Table 8A as the supplier has duly filed GSTR-1 in stipulated time. The cancellation must have been done at a later date and we are fully eligible to get credit as per Section 16(2) of CGST Act, 2017. Observations and conclusion of the assessing authority : Not Agreed with Tax Payer Specific reasons entered The reply of the taxpayer has been examined and found that reply is incomplete/not comprehensive and no supporting documents....