Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (5) TMI 1127

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....respect of CENVAT Credit of CVD/SAD paid by the appellant, I find that- a. The appellant has not fulfilled export obligation in respect of Advance Authorisation Nos. 0510397229 dated 07/01/2016, 0510399240 dated 27/06/2016 and 0510399241 dated 27/06/2016. b. Accordingly, the appellant had paid BCD, CVD, SAD & CESS along with applicable interest vide challan Sr. No. 006856, 006853, 006854, 006855 all dated 22/10/2018 and No. 2368 and 2369 both dated 28/09/2018. c. As per section 142 (6)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017, the amount paid by the appellant due to non-fulfillment of their obligations for exports made under Advance Authorisation is not admissible as Input Tax Credit. Thus, the appellant is not entitled to refund of the Customs duties (CVD & SAD). d. Payments of BCD, CVD, SAD & CESS made on account of non fulfillment of export obligation against Advance Authorizations are not admissible as valid Input Tax Credit under the provisions of Rule 9(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 as said duties were paid by the appellant on account of contraventions of the provisions of FTP as well as contravention of Customs Law. e. In similar issue in t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e refund claim falls under section 142(6)(a) of the CGST Act and the appellant is entitled to refund. 6. The Assistant Commissioner, by order dated 21.08.2019, rejected the refund claim on the following grounds: (i) The appellant did not produce any evidence that it had paid customs duties voluntarily. (ii) The refund is not eligible under rule 9(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 [the 2004 Credit Rules] on account of non-levy, short levy by reason of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement with intent to evade duty, as it was alleged that the appellant was fully aware of non-fulfilling of export obligation. (iii) The transitional provisions under CGST Act do not talk about refund of any payment made after 01.07.2017 to discharge liability of existing laws. 7. The appellant filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) against the said order dated 21.08.2019 on the ground that the case falls under section 142(6)(a) of the CGST Act and that the appellant had voluntarily paid customs duties foregone at the time of import of inputs. An affidavit was also filed stating that CVD and SAD were paid voluntarily. 8. The Commissioner (Appeals), by order dat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Tribunal in United Seamless Tubular Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commr. of Central Tax, Rangareddy-2019 (28) G.S.T.L. 244 (Tri.-Hyd.). 14. The submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned authorized representative appearing for the department have been considered. 15. The Commissioner (Appeals), as would be seen from paragraph 8 of the order dated 25.01.2023 reproduced above, has placed reliance upon section 142(6)(b) of the CGST Act and rule 9(1) of the Credit Rules as also to the decision of the Tribunal in Servo Packaging for rejecting the refund claim. 16. The issue that arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the appellant is entitled to claim refund of CENVAT credit in cash on the amount of CVD and SAD paid under the existing law under the provisions of section 142(3) of the CGST Act. 17. In order to appreciate this issue, it would be appropriate to refer to the relevant provisions. 18. The term "assessment‟ has been defined in section 2(11) of the CGST Act and it is as follows: "2(11) "assessment" means determination of tax liability under this Act and includes self-assessment, re-assessment, provisional as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....07.2017. Subsections (3), (6)(a) and (6)(b), are reproduced below: "142 (3) Every claim for refund filed by any person before, on or after the appointed day, for refund of any amount of CENVAT credit, duty, tax, interest or any other amount paid under the existing law, shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of existing law and any amount eventually accruing to him shall be paid in cash, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained under the provisions of existing law other than the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944): Provided that where any claim for refund of CENVAT credit is fully or partially rejected, the amount so rejected shall lapse. Provided further that no refund shall be allowed of any amount of CENVAT credit where the balance of the said amount as on the appointed day has been carried forward under this Act. ***** (6) (a) every proceeding of appeal, review or reference relating to a claim for CENVAT credit initiated whether before, on or after the appointed day under the existing law shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of existing l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... or "amended Act", as the case may be) to the extent mentioned in the sub-section (1) or section 173 shall not - (a) ***** (b) ***** (c) ***** (d) ***** (e) ***** (f) affect any proceedings including that relating to an appeal, review or reference, instituted before on, or after the appointed day under the said amended Act or repealed Acts and such proceedings shall be continued under the said amended Act or repealed Acts as if this Act had not come into force and the said Acts had not been amended or repealed." 26. The CENVAT Rules were made under section 37 of the Excise Act and section 94 of the Finance Act. Under rule 4(7), CENVAT credit in respect of input service was allowed, on or after the day on which the invoice, bill or, as the case may be, challan referred to in rule 9 was received. Under rule 9(1)(e) of the CENVAT Rules, credit can be taken on the basis of a challan evidencing payment of service tax, by the service recipient as the person liable to pay service tax. Section 173 of the CGST Act provides that save as otherwise provided in this Act, Chapter V of the Finance Act shall be omitted. Section 174(1) of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the CGST Act. 31. This is precisely the issue that arises for consideration in this appeal. After consideration of the relevant provisions of the CGST Act and the 2004 of the Credit Rules, the Division Bench of the Tribunal in Shakti Pumps observed as follows: "34. Section 142, as noticed above, deals with Miscellaneous Transitional Provisions. Sub-section (3) provides that every claim for refund filed by any person before, on or after the appointed day, for refund of any amount of CENVAT credit or any other amount paid under the existing law, shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the existing law and any amount eventually accruing to him shall be paid in cash, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained under the provisions of existing law, other than the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 11B of the Central Excise Act. However, no refund shall be allowed of any amount of CENVAT credit where the balance of the said amount as on the appointed day has been carried forward under the CGST Act. 35. Thus, under sub-section (3) of section 142, the claim for refund of any amount of CENVAT credit has to be disposed of in accordance ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 08.12.2017 after the CGST Act had come into force. xxxxxxxxxxx 16. In the present case, the appellant had deposited the short payment of service tax under the reverse charge mechanism in respect of import of service on 08.12.2017, after the time period prescribed for filing the last ST-3 Return had expired. This amount was, therefore, not reflected in the ST-3 Return. The CGST Act came into force w.e.f. 01.07.2017. The appellant, therefore, could not claim the transition of the input credit under section 140 of the CGST Act. The appellant could not also avail CENVAT credit under the CENVAT Rules as they were no longer in force after the introduction of the CGST Act. 17. It is for this reason that the appellant filed an application under section 142(3) of the CGST Act claiming refund of the amount of CENVAT credit paid by the appellant. This claim of the appellant was rejected by the Deputy Commissioner by the order dated 24.04.2019 and the appeal filed by the appellant before the Commissioner (Appeals) was also rejected by the order dated 21.09.2019. xxxxxxxxxxx 49. In the present case, the service tax was paid under the provisions of C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, it is held that they are entitled to refund of the said amount." (emphasis supplied) 64. In Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Ahmedabad-I vs. Aculife Healthcare Private Limited, the Division Bench observed: "5. We find that the department sought to deny the refund of CVD and SAD paid by the appellant only on the ground that at the time of payment of CVD and SAD there was no provision of availing the Cenvat credit, therefore, it was alleged that the appellant was not in position to avail the Cenvat credit, therefore consequently even refund of the amount which is not cenvatable could not have been claimed. We find that the appellant have paid the CVD and SAD for the period prior to 01.07.2017 even though the payment was made subsequent to 01.07.2017. Therefore, since the duty is paid by the appellant are for the period when the Cenvat credit Rules was existing, the appellant were entitled for Cenvat credit during period prior to 01.07.2017. In CGST Act to deal with situation of the present case, special provision was made under Section 142(3) whereby when the assessee is not in a position to avail the Cenvat credit or utilize the same due to effec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....L. 63 (Tri. - Chennai). 66. The inevitable conclusion, therefore, that follows from the aforesaid discussion is that Shakti Pumps is entitled to cash refund of CENVAT credit on the amount of CVD and SAD paid even after 01.07.2017. The Commissioner (Appeals), therefore, committed no illegality in granting this relief to Shakti Pumps. (emphasis supplied) 32. It is clear from the aforesaid decision of the Tribunal in Shakti Pumps that Shakti Pumps was held entitled to claim refund of CENVAT credit in cash under the provision of section 142(3) of the CGST Act even though Shakti Pumps had paid CVD and SAD post implementation of the CGST Act and in terms of the 2004 Credit Rules, as applicable prior to 01.07.2017, Shakti Pumps was entitled to claim CENVAT credit of CVD and SAD paid on imports. The appellant would, therefore, be entitled to refund in cash CENVAT credit of the amount of CVD and SAD paid after 01.07.2017. 33. Learned authorized representative appearing for the department has placed reliance upon a judgment of the Jharkhand High Court in Rungta Mines. The relevant paragraphs of the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court are reproduced below: "41. Thu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the matter also while rejecting the application for refund filed by the petitioner." (emphasis supplied) 34. It would be seen that the Jharkhand High Court after acknowledging that under section 142(3) of the CGST Act a refund application can be filed with respect to any amount relating to CENVAT credit paid under the existing law and it has to be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the existing law, the refund was not granted for the reason that the writ petitioner had not claimed transactional credit, but had claimed the amount of service tax on 'port service' as credit in the ST-3 returns to which it was admittedly not entitled to as it was an assessee under service tax only on reverse charge mechanism and admittedly the "port services" availed by the writ petitioner was not covered under reverse charge mechanism. Thus, it was found as a fact that the writ petitioner had not only illegally taken credit of service tax on "port services" as credit in the ST-3 returns, but had filed an application for refund of the same under section 142(3) of the CGST Act, which was not permissible in law. This decision of the Jharkhand High Court in Rungta Mines would, therefo....