Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (5) TMI 1169

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d. CIT(A) erred in holding that the "as there is no credit outstanding in the books of the appellant in case of fully repaid loans, these credits cannot be treated as unexplained credits". 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer of Rs. 535,23,19,470/- u/s 68 of the Act as the creditworthiness & genuineness of transactions were not proved in this case. 3. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer of Rs. 9,44,59,921/-u/s 69C of the Act as the interest expenses was claimed on fictitious loans. 4. The appellant craves to amend, modify, alter, a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rifying the material available on record. 5. The Ld. Departmental Representative vehemently submitted that though the creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction were not proved, the Ld. CIT(A) has proceeded to delete the addition of Rs. 535,23,19,470/- made by the A.O. u/s 68 of the Act. The Ld. Departmental Representative also submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) committed error in deleting the addition of Rs. 9,44,59,921/- made u/s 69 of the Act as the interest expense was claimed on fictitious loan. The Ld. Departmental Representative relying on the assessment order, sought for allowing the Appeal. 6. We have heard the Ld. Departmental Representative and perused the material available on record. The Assessee had received fresh un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ltd. AAECN9018J E-704, MahavirDarshan, Charkop Sector-2, Kandevali West, Mumbai-400 067 5,00,00,000 11. Saubhagya Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. AALCS1157L 106, 1st Floor, Surya Kiran Building, 19, K.G. Marg, New Delhi-110 001 12,50,00,000 12. Tigar Developers Pvt. Ltd. AACCT7439H A-113, Brother Hood Apartment, H Block, VikasPuri, New Delhi-110 018 5,00,00,000 13. Zigtraka Solutions Pvt. Ltd. AAACZ5861F 4-5 Yogita Park Apartment, Oppo. ITI Aundah, Pune-411 007 5,00,00,000   (Total Fresh amount received during the year) Rs.     5,44,06,58,000/- 7. In order to verify the genuineness of the said financial transactions an inspector has deputed by the A.O. for the field ....