TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (5) TMI 1198
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....27 of the Constitution of India challenging the show cause notice dated 14th May, 2024 (hereinafter, 'the SCN') issued by the Department of Trade and Taxes, GNCTD, pertaining to the Financial Year 2019-20, as also the consequent order dated 24th August, 2024 passed by the office of Sales Tax Officer Class II/ AVATO, Delhi (hereinafter, 'the impugned order'). 3. The petition also challenges the vires of Notification No. 9/2023-Central Tax dated 31st March, 2023, Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28th December, 2023 as also the Notification No. 09/2023-State Tax dated 22nd June, 2023 and Notification No. 56/2023-State Tax dated 11th July, 2024 (hereinafter 'impugned notifications'). 4. The validity of the impugned notifications....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....held the validity of Notification no. 9. The Patna High Court has upheld the validity of Notification no.56. Whereas, the Guwahati High Court has quashed Notification No. 56 of 2023 (Central Tax). 6. The Telangana High Court while not delving into the vires of the assailed notifications, made certain observations in respect of invalidity of Notification No. 56 of 2023 (Central Tax). This judgment of the Telangana High Court is now presently under consideration by the Supreme Court in S.L.P No 4240/2025 titled M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors. The Supreme Court vide order dated 21st February, 2025, passed the following order in the said case: "1. The subject matter of challenge before the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the interim orders passed therein. The operative portion of the said order reads as under: "65. Almost all the issues, which have been raised before us in these present connected cases and have been noticed hereinabove, are the subject matter of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid SLP. 66. Keeping in view the judicial discipline, we refrain from giving our opinion with respect to the vires of Section 168-A of the Act as well as the notifications issued in purported exercise of power under Section 168-A of the Act which have been challenged, and we direct that all these present connected cases shall be governed by the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the decision thereto shall be binding on t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tand before the adjudicating authority. In some cases, proceedings including appellate remedies may be permitted to be pursued by the Petitioners, without delving into the question of the validity of the said notifications at this stage. 11. The said categories and proposed reliefs have been broadly put to the parties today. They may seek instructions and revert by tomorrow i.e., 23rd April, 2025." 5. Thereafter, on 23rd April, 2025, this Court, having noted that the validity of the impugned notifications is under consideration before the Supreme Court, had disposed of several matters in the said batch of petitions after addressing other factual issues raised in the respective petitions. Additionally, while disposing of the said....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d order reads as under: "Whereas, SCN/ DRC-1 [see rule 100(2) & 142(1(a)] was issued to the taxpayer under Section 73 of CGST / DGST Act & Rules, 2017. And whereas, in response to the DRC-01, the Taxpayer has not submitted his reply nor appeared for personal hearing on the given date and time mentioned in DRC-01 before the undersigned. Further, another opportunity to submit reply and for the sake of natural justice opportunity for Personal Hearing, as per provision of Section 75(4) DGST Act, was also provided to the taxpayer by issuing "REMINDER" through the GST portal. And whereas, further as per section 73 (7) notice of tax and interest is to be given while section 73 (9) prescribed for imposition of pe....