Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (12) TMI 1440

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN BHARATH MOHAN SABU PULLAN GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN FOR THE RESPONDENT : R1 & R2 BY SMT SEENA C., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR R3 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR INCOME TAX ORDER P. G. AJITHKUMAR, J. The petitioners, aggrieved by the order dated 05.10.2023 of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Perinthalamanna in C.M.P.No.1502 of 2023, have filed this Revision Petition under Sect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....istrate, the 3rd respondent filed C.M.P. No.1948 of 2022 claiming that the said amount is liable to be released to the department since the petitioner did not account the said amount or pay tax for it. The learned Magistrate, after hearing both sides, dismissed C.M.P.No.1107 of 2022 and allowed C.M.P.No.1948 of 2022 as per Annexure I order directing to release the amount to the 3rd respondent on t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Magistrate again by filing CMP No. 1502 of 2023 invoking the provisions of Section 452 of the Code. It was contended that the 3rd respondent did not conclude the process of assessment within a period of six months and as no other proceedings in relation to the money is pending, the petitioners were entitled to get the money released. The learned Magistrate dismissed that petition as per the impug....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ect. It was held so following the law laid down by the Apex Court in J.R.Malhotra and another v. Additional Sessions Judge, Jullundur and others [AIR 1876 SC 219]. 6. Having heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent, I find no reason to deviate from the view taken by this Court in Ravirajan (supra). Further, the learned S....