2025 (5) TMI 849
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....TICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA For the Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashutosh Dave, Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Ms. Hetvi Patel and Ms. Taniya Bansal, Advocates. For the Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Subham Kumar and Mr. Dipak Raj, Advocates for R-1/DGGI. Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt. Counsel with Mr. Chaitanya Kumar, Advocates for R-2 with Mr. Narendra Kumar, Insp. R....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n. 4. The said goods were intercepted in the Mumbai Central - New Delhi Rajdhani Express (12951). The seizure was undertaken by the RPF on 5th / 6th September, 2024. After the seizure, it is the case of the Petitioners that no seizure memos or show cause notices were issued to them in any form. 5. The agent of the Petitioners i.e., one Mr. Nitin Pravinbhai Mistry was summoned under Section 7....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (i) Total value of the cash amount - Rs. 85,72,360/-; (ii) Gold Bar weighing 498 gm (costing approx. Rs. 36,70,260/-); and (iii) Silver ornaments and bricks weighing 365.704 Kg. (costing approx. Rs. 27,95,69,995/-). 7. Notice was issued in this matter on 16th April, 2025 on which date, the Court had also directed the Director General, RPF to also be impleaded. Subseque....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nsel is requested to accept notice for the Income Tax Department. 11. The position, therefore, today is that the GST Department is continuing with its investigation. The Income Tax Department also appears to have commenced some proceedings in respect of the items which have been seized. 12. Since the investigation is already underway and both the Departments are taking action, it is deemed a....
TaxTMI