1993 (3) TMI 114

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the parties. 2. The petitioner has come up to this Court on second round. 3. By order dated 26th May, 1992, the Tribunal rejected the application of the petitioner for interim order and directed the petitioner to pay entire amount of duty within 12 weeks. The petitioner challenged the said order of the Tribunal before this Court. By order dated 27th August, 1992 (Annexure 8 to the writ petit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d 26th May, 1992, within a period of four weeks. 5. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the petitioner has come up to this Court. Grievance of the petitioner is that it was not heard on merits and that the Tribunal took the view that the petitioner was not financially handicapped, because profits had been reflected in the balance sheet. The petitioner would have established financial hardship had....