2024 (2) TMI 1549

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Datar, Sr. Adv.  Mr. M.V Mukunda, Adv. Ms. Hina Shaheen, Adv. Mr. Mithun Shashank, Adv. Mr. M.V Swaroop, Adv.  Mr. Hredai Sriram, Adv. Mr. Nishanth Patil, AOR Mr. K.Parameshwar, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv.  Mr. Debmalya Banerjee, Adv. Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Adv. Mr. Rohan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gurtej Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhish....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r challenge modifying the awards. It is, therefore, of seminal importance that through an authoritative pronouncement clarity is provided for the guidance of the Courts which are required to exercise jurisdiction under the aforesaid sections 34 and 37, as the case may be, day in and day out. 3. We are of the considered view that the following questions need to be referred to a larger Bench for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation Company vs. Union of India (2023) SCC Online SC 982  and SV Samudram vs. State of Karnataka (2024) SCC Online SC 19  lay down the correct law, as other benches of two Judges (in Vedanta Limited vs. Shenzden Shandong Nuclear Power Construction Company Limited (2019) 11 SCC 465, Oriental Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Kerala (2021) 6 SCC 150  and M.P. Power Generati....