2025 (5) TMI 447

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....#39;BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA For the Petitioner Through: Mr. Gagan Kumar, Ms. Puja Jakhar, Mr. Gagandeep, Advocates. For the Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Naincy Jain, JSC; Ms. Madhavi Shukla, JSC and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocate. VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The Petitioner has filed the present petition, in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitions were listed before this court on 16.04.2025 and this court had passed the following order: "W.P.(C) 4773/2025 & CMAPPL. 21987/2025(Stay) CM APPL. 21989/2025(Addl. documents) W.P.(C) 4789/2025 & CM APPL. 22031/2025(Stay) CM APPL. 22033/2025(Addl. documents) 3. The petitioner has filed the present petitions, inter alia, impugning the order(s) dat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessment with the concerned AO. 6. In view of the above, we consider it apposite to examine whether the impugned orders are passed wholly without any jurisdiction. 7. Mr Chandra, learned counsel appearing for the Revenue submits that an order under Section 127 of the Act has been passed. However, he requires to take confirm instructions in this regard. Clearly, if an order un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Act and has advanced submissions on two fronts: first, that the order passed under Section 127 of the Act is invalid on the ground that it assumes that the Petitioner is an assessee located in Delhi; and second, that no notice was issued to the Petitioner before passing the said order. Clearly, none of these grounds find mention in the present petition as according to the Petitioner, no such ord....