1992 (8) TMI 81
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....earned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Shishir Kumar, learned counsel representing the respondents, at length and in detail. 2. The petitioners are the owners/drivers of the trucks seized for violation of the provisions of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. 3. By means of the impugned notices dated 5th June, 1992 they have been called upon to show cause as to why :- (a) their trucks may ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion of evidence thereon which cannot be done by this Court in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. There is another aspect of the matter, namely, the petitioners have approached this court rather prematurely without even answering the show cause notices issued to them. Hitherto no orders adverse to them have been passed. 7. Ordinarily....
TaxTMI