Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1991 (2) TMI 131

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellate Tribunal dated 27-12-1990 passed in a stay application. 2. The appeal before the second respondent-Tribunil relates to the demand of duty to the tune of Rs. 10,25,388.19 for the period from 11-6-1987 to 31-7-1989 and the personal penalty of Rs. 50,000/- imposed by the first respondent-Collector of Central Excise on 8-8-1990. The Tribunal points out that the petitioner was paying under T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the conclusion that the petitioner has an arguable case in the appeal. However, the Tribunal observed that the petitioner does not have a strong prima facie case. So far as the question of financial hardship is concerned, the Tribunal observed that there is no plea by the petitioner in the grounds of appeal. This is disputed by the petitioner and it is contended that the petitioner has also plead....