Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (4) TMI 1163

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-M/s Brijbihari Concast Pvt. Ltd through its Director Mr. Rajeev Agarwal under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking issuance of an appropriate writ assailing the Order-in-Original bearing no. 01/MEZU/2024 dated 28th March 2024 (hereinafter 'impugned order') by which the provisional attachment of the bank account bearing no. 201002965063 of the Petitioner has been affirmed. 3. Mr. Atul Tripathi, Ld. Sr. Standing Counsel for the Respondents submits that pursuant to the order dated 27th February, 2025, the records of the Respondents were produced on 20th March 2025. After perusing the records, the Court had direct....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on, the allegation of the DGGI was that its officials took note of the stock of raw material which was found in heaps in the factory and the same was tallied with the various registers maintained by the Company. 8. According to the DGGI, some of the stock was found in excess and the same was unaccounted for in the books. The DGGI was therefore of the opinion that the same required a detailed probe and that the goods were liable for confiscation. The goods were then handed over to Mr. Sanjeev Aggarwal of the Petitioner company for safe custody. 9. After conducting the search and seizure, the Panchnama was drawn on 13th December, 2023. Subsequent to the drawing of the Panchnama, a letter dated 18th December 2023 was issued in the form o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (v) M / s BCPL is a taxable person having GSTIN -05AACCB5197N1ZA." 11. However, the said order itself acknowledges in paragraph (E) that the stand of the Petitioner is that a substantial amount of GST has been paid by the Petitioner and Income tax has also been paid in the previous years. Paragraphs (E) and (F) of the said order is extracted below: "E. That M/s Brijbihari Concast Private Limited has paid huge amount towards taxes of Goods and Service Tax during the last three years without any delay and default. The company has paid Rs. 1,16,57,07,492/- as a GST and Income Tax Rs. 40615722/- during the last three years. F. The said company is running strictly in compliance of law and with required license and permissi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to be secured by the Court. 16. Heard. A perusal of the Panchnama would show that the same was a surprise investigation which was conducted. On the basis of certain records produced by the Petitioner's officials, a prima facie estimation has been made that there is a mis-match. The amount of stock was higher than what was declared in terms of the records of the Petitioner company. 17. It is to be noted that a period of more than 16 months has lapsed since the issuance of the Panchnama and one year has elapsed since the passing of the impugned order dated 28th March 2024. As on date, no show cause notice has been issued, though the same, as per the Department, is likely to be issued shortly. Mr. Tripathi submits that the Department has....