2025 (4) TMI 1075

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvocates. For the UOI/Respondent: Mr. Jitendra Mishra a/w Ashutosh Mishra, Advocates. P.C. 1. The above Writ Petition was disposed of by an Order dated 21st January 2025 setting aside the impugned Order dated 29th January 2024 and directing Respondent No. 3 to allow the 111 applications filed by the Petitioner for grant of scrips under the MEIS during the period June 2017 to August 2020 a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t all; Category 2 - 38 applications for the period June 2017 to December 2018, where the claims were partially processed at the rate of 2%; Category 3 - 1 application allotted File no. 27/21/090/5033/AM 21 dated 13.06.2020, which was not included in the impugned Order but was pending to be processed. 4. In compliance of the Order dated 21st January 2025 of this Hon'ble Court, now 69 application....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ore the Hon'ble Apex Court. 8. As stated in paragraph 9 of the Order dated 21st January 2025, although the issue of classification of the Petitioners goods (involved in the present proceedings), has been contested on different levels, the dispute in the present Petition was restricted to the non-process of pending applications and non-granting of the reward/scrips under the MEIS as set out in t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... days from today. 12. In respect of the applications stated at category 2 and category 3 at paragraph 3 above, we have been informed that (i) 38 applications in respect of which the duty credit scrip was sanctioned @ 2% are not reflecting on the DGFT portal and hence, cannot be processed and (ii) 1 application dated 13.06.2020 is also not visible/reflecting to Respondent No. 3 on the DGFT porta....