Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (4) TMI 963

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... "the appellant", for short) on the basis of Review Order No.37/Review/CCO/S.TAX/2016 dated 21.09.2016 passed by the Committee of Chief Commissioners, Mumbai, assailing the Order-in- Original No.51-55/STC-IV/MRRR/16-17 dated 31.05.2016 (herein after, referred to as "the impugned order") passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-IV, Mumbai. 2. Revenue has also filed this miscellaneous application bearing No.85991 of 2024, seeking change of name and address of the appellant arising on account of change in jurisdiction of the Service Tax authorities from 'Commissioner, Service Tax-IV, Mumbai' to 'Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai Central' and change in the name of the respondent, on account of the merger of the company a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the subsequent period too, four SCNs dated 12.03.2013, 13.01.2014, 30.03.2015 and 08.09.2015 were also issued covering the period 01.10.2011 to 31.03.2015. The SCNs were adjudicated on the basis of appellant's reply letter dated 31.03.2016 to the SCNs and the submissions made during the personal hearing. Vide Order-in-Original dated 31.05.2016, which is impugned herein, the original authority had dropped all the proceedings initiated in the SCNs. Feeling aggrieved with this impugned order, the appellant had filed this appeal before the Tribunal. 4. Heard both sides and perused the records of the case. we have also considered the additional written submissions given in the form of paper book by both sides. 5. The issue in dispute is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assive Infrastructure support services, the Invoice so raised by the Vendor is bifurcated into the following categories and separate Invoices are raised for each category: a) Infrastructure professional fees -The invoice is raised for this amount for providing passive infrastructure. b) Site operation service fees -The amount represents the fees in respect of operations carried out on the site. c) Reimbursement of expenses towards electricity, diesel etc. - The Vendor is required to use electricity and diesel for providing 24 x 7 power back, so that the equipments owned by the Noticee can function. The electricity and diesel are Inputs for the Vendor to provide Passive Infrastructure Support services to the Notice....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt of Cenvat credit. The noticee submitted sample copies of the debit noted issued by M/s GTL Infra on which the Cenvat Credit has been availed by them. The details available on one such Debit note dated 15/2/2011 issued by M/s GTL infrastructures are as follows:.... 25.4 From the above. I find that the debit notes issued by the vendor contains all the relevant details as prescribed/required under Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994 and hence qualifies as a specified document for availing Cenvat Credit under Rule 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Thus I hold that debit notes on which Cenvat credit has been taken by the noticee are valid documents for availing the Cenvat Credit and hence the allegation made in the show cause notices th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed 30th June 2016 of Commissioner of Service Tax - IV, Mumbai dropping proceedings for recovery of CENVAT credit availed by M/s Idea Cellular Ltd amounting to ₨. 11,28,86,302/- for 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, the issue for resolution is whether (a) 'debit note' suffices for the documentation requirements prescribed in rule 9 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and (b) if it does, whether such debit notes/invoices pertaining to reimbursements of diesel and electricity costs incurred by the service provider on which tax under Finance Act, 1994 has been duly discharged enables the recipient to take credit. xxx xxx xxx xxx 3. It is seen from records that M/s Spice Communications Ltd (since taken over by the resp....