Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (4) TMI 968

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant on 'renting of immovable property' service rendered during the period April 2008 to March 2009 along with demand of interest at appropriate rates and equivalent penalty imposed. 2. The facts are that the appellants who are manufacturers of Electrical Steel Transformer laminations had registered as a service provider for providing taxable service of "renting of immovable property" with effect from 28-05-2009. During verification of their accounts, it was noticed that the appellants had leased out their premises to M/s. Anmod Stamping Pvt Ltd on rent during the period 2008-09 collecting a sum of Rs.1,02,00,000/-. The Department being of the view that this amounted to providing taxable service of "renting of immovable property" advis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssion that it was only vide Finance Act, 2010 that the scope of such levy was suitably amended "retrospectively" to validate the demand of such tax already raised and even the TRU clarification bearing DOF No.334/1/2010-TRU dated 26.02.2010 at para 9.2 clarifies that the retrospective amendment was to clarify the legislative intent and to also bring "certainty" in tax liability of renting of immovable property, thereby meaning that there was confusing during the material period and hence the necessity of retrospective amendment. He submitted that in identical circumstances the Tribunal has in various decisions held the demand of service tax under renting of immovable property services to be time barred in light of the retrospective amendmen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order dated 18-04-2009 in Home Solution Retail India Ltd, 2009 (14) STR 433 (Del) held that Section 65(105)(zzzz) does not in terms entail that the renting out of immovable property for use in the course or furtherance of business of commerce would by itself constitute a taxable service and be exigible to service tax under the said Act. The CBEC vide Letter D.O. F. No. 334/3/2010-TRU, dated 1-7-2010 on the subject of changes proposed in service tax law and procedure in Union Budget 2010-11, has at para 9.2 stated that "9.2 In order to clarify the legislative intent and also bring in certainty in tax liability the relevant definition of taxable service is being amended to clarify that the activity of renting of immovable property per se wou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... We also notice that in the decision in Jindal Vegetable Products Ltd v CCE, Meerut-II, 2013 (31) STR 367 (Tri-Del), on an identical issue where demand of service tax was made on renting of immovable property services for the period 2007-2008 to 2008-09, the Tribunal has held in para 6 as under: "6. There is no dispute that the activity of the appellant was renting of immovable property. Though "service in relation to renting of immovable property" had been brought within the service tax net w.e.f. 1-6-2007 by introducing Section 65(105)(zzzz), the validity of this levy had been challenged before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and Hon'ble Delhi High Court vide judgment dated 18th April, 2009 in the case of Home Solution Retail India ....