2025 (4) TMI 921

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Petitioner : Mr.Vibu Nandhan And Mr.A.Deepak Raj For the Respondents : Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar, Standing Counsel ORDER Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar, learned Standing Counsel who takes notice on behalf of the respondent. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e as to which show cause notice, he is required to file reply; that though the petitioner, vide their letter dated 19.03.2025, requested the first respondent to give one month to file response/reply, but the first respondent granted only two working days to file reply and fixed the personal hearing on 24.03.2025 on the pre-text that the case would become time barred on 31.03.2025, which necessitat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted 12.03.2025, wherein, a reference was made to the earlier show cause notice issued by the second respondent, Faceless Assessing Officer dated 28.02.2025, and therefore, the contention of the petitioners that the petitioner was totally perplexed as to which show cause notice, they have to file reply is baseless. Hence, the learned Standing Counsel for dismissal of the Writ Petition as being devo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cer, first respondent, therefore, the contention of the petitioner that the petitioner got perplexed as to which show cause notice, they have to file reply/objection is baseless, as rightly pointed out by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. 6.1 In view of the above, though this Court is not inclined to entertain the Writ Petition, however, grants liberty to the petitioner to file r....