Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1990 (9) TMI 98

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of order passed by Central Government, under Section 36 (2) of the Central Excise Act, as it then stood, is challenged herein. The petitioner is a manufacturer engaged in production of Khandsari Sugar. He filed a refund claim for a sum of about Rs. 9,000/- pertaining to period 1-3-1975. It was rejected by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise by his order dated 28-10-1977. The petitioner says t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he order is unacceptable. On that basis the Central Government was of the opinion that the appeal before the Appellate Collector was barred by time. It accordingly set aside the order of the Appellate Collector and restored the order of the Assistant Collector. 2. Though a counter is filed by the respondents, it is not explained as to how Nisar Ahmad, who is said to have received the said communi....