2025 (4) TMI 682

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y Mangal, Ms. Aakanchha Jhunjhunwala, Mr. Pawan Arora, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Annirudh Sharma with Ms. Navya Nanda, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. Apratim Animesh Thakur with Mr. Lakshya Sachdeva, Ms. Ankita Rawat and Ms. Varnika M., Advocates for respondent Nos.2 and 3. JUDGMENT (oral) 1. Petitioners are seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against respondents f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1.95 crores and have also received back the original Title Deed. 4. However, the grievance is with respect to the fact that the criminal complaints filed by the respondents herein are still being proceeded with. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a criminal complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 had been filed against him by respondent No.1 herein bef....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ne complaint made by the respondents/contemnors, FIR No.97/2024 dated 09.03.2024, PS Hari Parbat Thana, Agra had been registered and which is still being pursued with. 9. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that the above said FIR had been registered prior to the above said order dated 03.04.2024 and the concerned Police officer had also been verbally apprised about the above developmen....