2025 (4) TMI 167

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Vivek Kumar Singh For the Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramamurthy For the Respondent : Mr.J.K.Jayaselan Government Advocate ORDER This writ petition is filed challenging the assessment order passed by the respondent, dated 10.09.2024, for the Assessment Year 2018-2019. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is a non-speaking order, violating Section 75(6) of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the petitioner also submits that there can be no demand for tax or input credit reversal by comparing Table 8A of Form GSTR-9 with Form GSTR-2A, as both refer to the same input tax credit available to the petitioner and not availed by it. 5. In support of his submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the following judgments:- (i) S.S.Communications, Rep. by its Prop....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is having an appeal remedy before the appellate Deputy Commissioner (State Tax) (GST Appeal), Madurai, under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. However, without invoking the appeal remedy, the petitioner has straightaway approached this Court. 7. Heard both sides. 8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the responde....