Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1989 (6) TMI 59

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tes. Until 30th November 1982 a Notification (No. 30/79-CE) prescribed a concessional rate of duty on cigarettes. By a Notification dated 30th November 1982 the earlier Notification was rescinded so that excise duty on cigarettes became payable at the tariff rate. On 3rd December 1982 the Superintendent, Central Excise, informed the petitioners of the above and requested them to submit a new price....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... They approached the Collector and on 23rd December 1982 the Collector informed them in writing of the reason. He said that the assessable values of the petitioners' cigarettes had not been changed in spite of the fact that a larger amount from the cum-duty price went towards the payment of excise duty. It, therefore, followed that the net amount received by the petitioners from the sale of cigare....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... disclosed the elements of manufacturing cost and manufacturing profit for the purposes of the assessable values of their cigarettes. His reasoning appears to be that if these had been correctly disclosed the petitioners would not been able to absorb the increase in the duty. He, therefore, proposed that the petitioners should submit a revised price list, in which the combined values of the manufa....