Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1989 (6) TMI 57

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0%. 2. The petitioners through their advocates wrote to the respondents on 6th December 1982 asking that the said goods be classified under Chapter 29.01/45 as an organic chemical. The said goods arrived in Bombay on 17th December 1982 and the petitioners through their advocates wrote to the respondents reiterating the said contention. They also requested that no countervailing duty should be charged in respect of the said goods in view of Excise Exemption Notification No. 104/82. On 21st December 1982 this writ petition was filed. On 29th December 1982 the petitioners through their advocates wrote to the respondents asking that Customs duty be levied on the said goods at the rate of 60% and for issuance of a detention certificate. They ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ompensatory support scheme for exports. It refers to Dextrose Anhydrous as a drug. A certificate has been issued by Universal Research and Analytical Laboratories on 19th October 1982 which states that Dextrose Anhydrous is an organic chemical which can be and is used as a drug and is included in the Indian Pharmacopoeia, 1966, and the U.S. and British Pharmacopoeias. It also states that Dextrose Anhydrous is a drug intermediate used in the manufacture of Sorbitol. The certificate issued by Italab on 15th January 1983 has already been referred to, as also the action of the respondents' Assistant Drug Controller. 5. No affidavit in reply has been filed. There is, therefore, no material to counter what has been referred to above. 6. Mr.....