Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Developer Termination Upheld Despite Insolvency Protection Under Section 238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The HC upheld SRA's termination of petitioner's appointment as developer of a slum rehabilitation project due to failure to pay transit rent arrears and complete the project within stipulated time. While IBC provisions generally have overriding effect under Section 238, the court determined that Slum Act's mandate for timely rehabilitation is not inconsistent with IBC objectives but furthers them. The obligation to pay transit rent was deemed a statutory duty, not merely contractual. The court found SRA's invocation of Section 13(2) lawful and justified, though noted a procedural deficiency in not granting the revived petitioner a final opportunity to clear dues. The resolution plan under IBC does not override obligations under the Slum Act except for financial claims arising before insolvency commencement.....