2025 (3) TMI 1002
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....25<br>W. P. No. 3586 of 2025 - -<br>Income Tax<br>THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY For the Appellant: Mr. Prahalad K.Bhat For the Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr. A.N.R. Jayaprahap Standing Counsel ORDER Heard Mr. Prahalad K. Bhat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. A.N.R. Jayaprahap, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hap, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that due to some dispute between the petitioner and the sixth respondent, as, the said sixth respondent appears to have given a complaint against the petitioner, alleging as if, that he owed a sum of Rs.5 Crores to the petitioner, the petitioner has made a representation to the respondent-Income Tax Department to find out t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... utter fallacious, as the said Srinivasan does not even had a source of income to pay such huge amount to the petitioner, therefore, in this regard, he made a representation to the respondent-Income Tax Department to find out the source of income of the said Srinivasan, whether he is an income tax assessee; whether he is filing any return of income; whether he is capable of having such huge amount....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....petitioner to find out the source of income of the sixth respondent. 6.1 Thus, as rightly pointed out by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Income Tax Department, unless and until any chargesheet is filed and final orders is passed based on the complaint lodged by the sixth respondent, the respondent-Income Tax Department would not come to the rescue of the petitioner to find out t....
TaxTMI