Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (3) TMI 893

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve heard final arguments advanced by learned counsel for both sides and examined the record. 3. Briefly stated, circumstances leading to the present appeal are as follows. 3.1 The present respondent filed a summary suit for recovery of Rs.14,04,000/- against the appellant, pleading that being tourist guide by profession, he was introduced with the appellant by their common friend; that the appellant allured him to invest money in some profitable venture, so he paid a total sum of Rs.14,04,000/- to the appellant in multiple installments during the period from 16.01.2013 to 27.01.2014; that thereafter, the appellant started avoiding him as regards the said investments and finally, on being persuaded, the appellant issued four post dated....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd was dismissed and consequently, the suit was decreed. 3.5 Hence, the present appeal. 4. During arguments today, learned counsel for appellant contends that the impugned judgment and decree are not sustainable in the eyes of law because there was no legally enforceable debt insofar as even according to the respondent, the money paid by him to the appellant was for investment. Learned counsel for appellant also contends that pleadings of the appellant clearly raised a triable issue as to whether the cheques in question were obtained under coercion after abducting and illegally detaining the appellant. No other argument has been advanced. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent supports the impugned judgment and decree....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... are sworn enemies. The discretion that a Judge exercises under Order 37 to refuse leave to defend or to grant conditional or unconditional leave to defend is a discretion akin to Joseph's multi-coloured coat - a large number of baffling alternatives present themselves. The life of the law not being logic but the experience of the trial Judge, is what comes to the rescue in these cases; but at the same time informed by guidelines or principles that we propose to lay down to obviate exercise of judicial discretion in an arbitrary manner. At one end of the spectrum is unconditional leave to defend, granted in all cases which present a substantial defence. At the other end of the spectrum are frivolous or vexatious defences, leading to ref....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t into court or furnishing security. Care must be taken to see that the object of the provisions to assist expeditious disposal of commercial causes is not defeated. Care must also be taken to see that such triable issues are not shut out by unduly severe orders as to deposit or security. 17.4. If the defendant raises a defence which is plausible but improbable, the trial Judge may impose conditions as to time or mode of trial, as well as payment into court, or furnishing security. As such a defence does not raise triable issues, conditions as to deposit or security or both can extend to the entire principal sum together with such interest as the court feels the justice of the case requires. 17.5. If the defendant has no s....