Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (3) TMI 710

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder of the Assessment Unit, Income-tax Department (in short, 'the A.O.') passed under section147 read with section 144Bof the Act, date of order 02/05/2023. 2. The assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:- "1. On facts, in circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax- Appeals, National Faceless Appeal Centre ought to have held that reopening of assessment of the appellant is invalid in law. 2. On facts, in circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax - Appeals, National Faceless Appeal Centre ought to have held that since the impugned notices under section 148, 148A(b) & 148A(d) have been issues by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, the subsequen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 1,05,00,000/-. This was the final settled consideration, and the property was registered at the same value, which was taken as the set forth value. However, the stamp duty valuation, as per the Stamp Duty Registration, amounted to Rs. 2,02,72,517/-, resulting in an addition of Rs. 97,72,517/- under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act. Aggrieved by this addition, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A), however, treated the assessee's allotment letter as a self-serving document and ultimately dismissed the appeal. Being dissatisfied with the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee has now preferred the present appeal before us. 4. The Ld.AR argued and filed a written submission containing pages 1 to 124. The ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to Section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act reveals the following: "56(2)(vii) .............................. (b) Any immovable property,- (i) Without consideration, if the stamp duty value exceeds fifty thousand rupees, the stamp duty value of such property shall be considered. (ii) If acquired for consideration that is less than the stamp duty value by an amount exceeding fifty thousand rupees, the portion of the stamp duty value exceeding such consideration shall be considered. Provided that where the date of the agreement fixing the amount of consideration for the transfer of immovable property and the date of registration are not the same, the stamp duty value as on the date of the agreement may be ....