Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (3) TMI 656

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....20 & 1221 of 2025 - -<br>Income Tax<br>Honourable Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy For the Petitioner : Ms. Parthika Devi for Mr. Richardson Wilson For the Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr. A.N.R. Jayaprathap Junior Standing Counsel ORDER Heard Ms. Parthika Devi learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, the learned Junior Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. 2. The chal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... impugned order dated rejected the Stay Petition, which necessitated the petitioner to approach this Court. 3.1 The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner has already deposited 15% of the disputed tax and therefore, prays that the onerous condition imposed by the first respondent requiring the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed tax may be reduced to 15%. 4. The ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h, the petitioner would be faced with recovery proceedings, the petitioner requested the first respondent to adjust the payment of 20% from and out of the refund payable to the petitioner, however, the first respondent without considering such request, rejected the Petition for Stay. However, considering the fact that the petitioner has already deposited 15% of the disputed tax and finds the condi....