Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (3) TMI 611

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... -<br>GST<br>Honourable Mr. Justice Vivek Kumar Singh For the Petitioner : Mr. S. Vidhya Sagar For the Respondents : Mr. J.K. Jayaselan Government Advocate for R2 & R4, Mr. K. Sankararaman CGSC for R1 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the interest demand order dated 30.12.2023, passed by the fourth respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....61 of the CGST Act, with respect to the levy of interest under Section 50(1) of the CGST Act. Therefore, the petitioner may challenge the rectification order in accordance with law. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record. 5. In the light of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate and also taking into consideration the fact th....