2025 (3) TMI 548

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... JJ. For the Petitioners: Adv. Rohan Shah, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gopal Mundhra, Mr. Harsh Shah, Ms. Ginita Bodani, Mr. Mohammed Anajwalla and Mr. Kalp Saraiya i/b. Economic Laws Practice,. For the Respondent Nos.1, 4 and 5: Adv. Ram Ochani with Adv. Niyati Mankad (through VC),. For the Respondent-State: Ms. S. D. Vyas, Addl. G. P. with Mr. Aditya Deolekar, AGP,. P. C. 1. Leave is gr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Services Tax Act, 2017. According to the Petitioners, the issues raised in the present Petition are squarely covered by a Division Bench decision of the Gujarat High Court in the case of Gujarat Chambers of Commerce and Industry & Others v/s. Union of India & Others (2025) (1) TMI 516 Gujarat High Court decided on 3rd January, 2025. 3. The Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court has taken a v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct. 4. Considering that one High Court has already taken this view and no contrary view has been placed before us, we find that this is an important issue that needs to be addressed by this Court. In fact, this issue has been raised in other Petitions as well, one such Petition being Writ Petition No.14434 of 2023 (Siemens Limited v/s. Union of India & Others). In fact, in the case of Siemens L....