2025 (3) TMI 318

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tice G.R. Swaminathan And Honourable Mr. Justice M. Jothiraman For the Appellant : Mr. R.D. Ganesan For the Respondent : Mr. R. Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader JUDGMENT Heard both sides. 2.The case on hand pertains to the assessment year 2017-2018. The appellant is an assessee falling within the jurisdiction of the respondent. The respondent called upon the appellant to p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the same, this Writ Appeal came to be filed. 3.When the matter was taken up on the last occasion, we passed the following order: "The learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that the technical glitch suffered by the petitioner can be set right only by the GST council. It appears that the petitioner had already sent representation to the GST Council. Unless the GST council i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eference cited. Due to a technical error, the tax due and ITC adjusted details for Tcl. Ashok Trading Company's GSTR 3B return for the month of March 2017 were incorrectly displayed as Zero. The ITC claim as per the GSTR 3B and ITC auto populated as per the GSTR 2A for March 2018 are now displayed in the "Tax Liabilities and Comparison Statement" for the year 2017-18. ....