Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (3) TMI 136

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t No. HY 421, as a tourist, and landed at Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport on 26th April, 2024. 3. He was carrying some gold chains and gold earrings etc., and the same was detained by the Customs Department at the Airport itself. The following is the details of the detained goods:  "(i) Four Gold Chains Purity 587 Weight 65 gm (ii) Two gold rings Purity 587 Weight 06 gm (iii) One pair and three gold earrings Purity 616 Weight 29 gm (iv) Two gold bracelet purity 586 Weight 12 gm" 4. It is the case of the Petitioner that after the detention receipt bearing DR No. DR/INDEL4/26.04.2024/52613 was issued, he did not receive any communication relating to show cause notice or any order which has been passed against him. It ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... allowed the same for re-export from India only by the Pax since the passenger is an Uzbekistan national having Uzbekistan Passport No. FA1519856. The redemption is to be allowed after the completion of legal formalities in this regard and also fulfilment of any regulatory clearances/ approvals required. The offer of redemption, if accepted, shall be subject to condition that the Pax shall not dispute the identity and valuation of the detained goods. The offer of redemption shall cease after 'One Hundred Twenty Days' from date of the receipt of this order; v) I also impose a penalty of Rs. 47,000/- (Rupees Forty Seven Thousand Only) on the passenger Gayrat Djabarov under Section 112(a) & 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962." 6. In addition, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... litigant is bound to state all facts which are relevant to the litigation. If he withholds some vital or relevant material in order to gain advantage over the other side then he would be guilty of playing fraud with the court as well as with the opposite parties which cannot be countenanced. *********** ************** ************* 16. It is necessary for us to state here that in order to check multiplicity of proceedings pertaining to the same subject-matter and more importantly to stop the menace of soliciting inconsistent orders through different judicial forums by suppressing material facts either by remaining silent or by making misleading statements in the pleadings in order to escape the liability of making a false statement, we....