2025 (3) TMI 136

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is his case that he came to India by flight No. HY 421, as a tourist, and landed at Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport on 26th April, 2024. 3. He was carrying some gold chains and gold earrings etc., and the same was detained by the Customs Department at the Airport itself. The following is the details of the detained goods:  "(i) Four Gold Chains Purity 587 Weight 65 gm (ii) Two gold rings Purity 587 Weight 06 gm (iii) One pair and three gold earrings Purity 616 Weight 29 gm (iv) Two gold bracelet purity 586 Weight 12 gm" 4. It is the case of the Petitioner that after the detention receipt bearing DR No. DR/INDEL4/26.04.2024/52613 was issued, he did not receive any communication relati....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ods confiscated above, on payment of a fine of Rs. 58,000/- (Rupees Fifty Eight Thousand Only) under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962 and allowed the same for re-export from India only by the Pax since the passenger is an Uzbekistan national having Uzbekistan Passport No. FA1519856. The redemption is to be allowed after the completion of legal formalities in this regard and also fulfilment of any regulatory clearances/ approvals required. The offer of redemption, if accepted, shall be subject to condition that the Pax shall not dispute the identity and valuation of the detained goods. The offer of redemption shall cease after 'One Hundred Twenty Days' from date of the receipt of this order; v) I also impose a penalty of Rs. 47,000/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the petitioner approaching the writ court must come with clean hands and put forward all facts before the Court without concealing or suppressing anything. A litigant is bound to state all facts which are relevant to the litigation. If he withholds some vital or relevant material in order to gain advantage over the other side then he would be guilty of playing fraud with the court as well as with the opposite parties which cannot be countenanced. *********** ************** ************* 16. It is necessary for us to state here that in order to check multiplicity of proceedings pertaining to the same subject-matter and more importantly to stop the menace of soliciting inconsistent orders through different judicial forums by....