1985 (4) TMI 69
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Mr. S.D. Shah waives service of Rule. The Petitioner company which is a textile manufacturing company seeks to challenge by this Petition the order of the second Respondent dated February 23, 1985 raising three demands in the sums of Rs. 7,64,330.71 for the period from July, 1983 to January, 1984, Rs. 2,78,677.92 for the period from November 15, 1983 to June, 1984 and Rs. 1,84,504.18 for the p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r cross-examination of the two authorities which was not granted. In spite of the application of the Petitioner company to permit cross-examination, the request was not only not heeded to but the assessment was made and the demands were raised which have been challenged in this Petition. 2. Having heard the learned advocates for both the sides, we are of the opinion that the second respondent o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....be intimated to the Petitioner in advance. It is expected that the Petitioner company will render all assistance and will not ask for any adjournment. The Learned Advocate for the Petitioners has assured us that the Petitioners will not ask for any adjournment and they will proceed with the cross-examination of the witnesses. In the circumstances, the impugned assessment order is set aside and the....
TaxTMI