2025 (2) TMI 880

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellant : Advs. K.S. Hariharan Nair, G. Remadevi, Harima Hariharan, Rajath R Nath, Dheeraj Sasidharan and Sree Haridev For the Respondent : G. P. Jasmin M.M JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P1 show cause notice apart from seeking a direction to pass separate orders for the various financial years and also to grant sufficient time for furnishing a reply for financial years 2018- 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oceeding in haste to complete the determination under Section 74 of the Act without granting sufficient opportunity to the petitioner. Though the petitioner contended that an opportunity for cross examination is not being granted and a composite order is proposed to be issued, there is nothing on record to assume that any procedure contrary to law would be adopted by the second respondent. The con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xamination is required by law and is not granted, the same is a matter to be considered at the appropriate stage by the appropriate authority. This Court cannot at this juncture assume that the apprehension of the petitioner is legally justified, especially in the absence of any material. 6. However taking note of the apprehension of the petitioner that a composite order will be issued by the s....