TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (2) TMI 622
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....from 04/2013 to 11/2013 it was noticed that the appellants had wrongly availed Cenvat credit of service tax paid on certain input services provided by service providers directly to the appellant and credit distributed by their corporate office and regional offices at Tamil Nadu & Kerala. The Department being of the view that the credit availed for demolition of chimneys decommissioned in the year 1990 by the appellants, the credit availed based on Input Service Distributor's (ISD) invoices on services of transportation rendered by clearing and forwarding agents, the credit distributed in respect of M/s.Chettinad Logistics, Chennai and M/s. Image Public Relations P Ltd, New Delhi, were ineligible credits availed by the appellants, issued a show cause notice (SCN) proposing recovery of the ineligible credits with appropriate interest thereon and proposing imposition of penalty. The appellants filed their reply contesting the allegations, pursuant to which they were granted a personal hearing and the adjudicating authority passed the impugned OIO confirming the demand of ineligible credits with appropriate interest thereon and imposing equivalent penalty. Aggrieved by the impugned OIO....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....1.2014. It is submitted that as per the definition of ISD in sub-rule (m) of Rule 2 it is clear that the ISD has to be an office of the manufacturer or producer of final products or provider of output service who will distribute the credit to his manufacturing units or service providing units as the case may be on an invoice containing the details specified in Rule 4A (2) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 (STR, 1994). Further, Rule 7 of CCR, 2004 prescribes the manner of distribution of credit by ISD, as per which the ISD may distribute the CENVAT credit in respect of the service tax paid on the input service to its manufacturing units or units providing output service, subject to the specified conditions. It is submitted that the impugned invoices have been issued by the Appellant's Head Office and Regional offices which are duly registered with jurisdictional Service Tax authorities in accordance with the statutory provisions and complying with the requirements of registration, periodical return submission, audits etc. Hence the returns filed by the said ISD registered premises are subject to scrutiny by their local authorities and the returns/accounts maintained in these registered....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....assed the order holding that the C & F agent is not liable to pay VAT as they are rendering services and thus it is clear that the services provided by the C& F agents at the appellant's godowns are services on which the appellant is entitled to take credit. That as regards the entitlement of the appellant to take credit on the ISD invoices issued with respect to services provided by M/s. Chettinad logistics, the appellant without prejudice to their submissions on jurisdiction had also submitted statement containing details of ISD credit pertaining to M/s. Chettinad logistics to substantiate that the corporate office had complied with the provisions of ISD mechanism as per Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. That the credit the appellant availed on ISD invoices pertaining to M/s. Image Public Relations ltd is for their advertisement made during IPL and such advertisements being for sales promotion they are entitled to avail cenvat credit as it is also covered by the term "in relation to" used in the inclusive part of the definition of input service as held by the decision of the Honourable Bombay High Court in M/s. Coca Cola India Pvt Ltd v CCE, Pune III, (2009) 242 ELT 168 (Bom). He also p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y, has to be recovered from the person who has taken credit. This judgement is squarely applicable to the present case and therefore, the appeal filed by the appellant may be rejected. 7. We have heard both sides, perused the records and relied upon case laws. 8. The issues boil down to whether the credit availed by the appellants on the services availed for demolition of chimneys decommissioned in the year 1990, the credit availed based on Input Service Distributor's (ISD) invoices on services of transportation rendered by clearing and forwarding agents, the credit distributed in respect of M/s. Chettinad Logistics, Chennai and M/s. Image Public Relations P Ltd, New Delhi, were ineligible credits availed by the appellants. 9. In order to appreciate the issue, it is necessary to examine the definition of input service as it existed in the CCR during the relevant period that is April 2013 to November 2013. The definition of "input service" in Rule 2(l) of the CCR came to be substituted by the Cenvat Credit First Amendment Rules, 2011 notified vide notification No.3/2011 C.E.(NT) dated 01.03.2011 with effect from 01.04.2011 and stood further amended vide Notification No.28/2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....efits extended to employees on vacation such as Leave or Home Travel Concession, when such services are used primarily for personal use or consumption of any employee. 11. On an analysis of the above definition, it is seen that the same is broadly in three parts; First part, which is the main part, covers input services used for providing output service or used by manufacturer, directly or indirectly, in relation to manufacture or clearance of final product upto the place of removal; Second part is the inclusive part of the definition which expands the scope beyond the coverage of the first part, the word 'includes' enlarging the scope, without being exhaustive or restrictive, and the Third part covers specific exclusions. The exclusions listed in sub-clause (A), sub-clause (B) and sub-clause (BA) have their exceptions; the service portion in the execution of a works contract and construction services including specified services in sub-clause (A) being permissible when they are used for provision of one or more of the specified services, that is, service listed under clause (b) of Section 66E of the Finance Act, namely the declared services of construction of a complex, bu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r, it is trite that generally the word "include" should be given a wide interpretation as by employing the said word, the legislature intends to bring in, by legal fiction, something within the accepted connotation of the substantive part. (Ramala Sahkari Chini Mills ltd v. Commissioner of C. Ex, Meerut-I, reported in 2010 (260) E.L.T. 321 (S.C.) refers). It is settled law that the expression "in relation to", used in the said rule, has to be given a wide connotation as has been held by the Apex Court in Collector of Central Excise v. Solaris Chemtech Limited, 2007(214) ELT 481 (SC) and Doypack Systems (Pvt) Ltd v. Union of India, 1988(36) ELT 201 (SC). 15. We also notice that, Rule 2(t) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provides that words and expressions used in these rules and not defined but defined in the Excise Act or the Finance Act shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in those Acts. While factory is not defined in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, it is seen that Section 2(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 defines "factory" means any premises, including the precincts thereof, wherein or in any part of which excisable goods other than salt are manufactured,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....agents, the preliminary objection of the appellant is that it is the responsibility of the jurisdictional officer with whom input service distributor has registered to decide the dispute regarding eligibility or otherwise of the service tax credit that the input service distributor has taken and proposes to pass on to others. The appellant has relied on the decision in Commr of Service Tax, Ahmedabad v Godfrey Philps India Ltd, 2009(14) STR 375 (Tri-Ahmd) in this regard, and we find that this Tribunal has indeed rendered a finding as contended by the appellant. The said decision is also seen followed by this Tribunal in United Phosphorous Ltd v CCE, Surat II, 2013 (30) STR 509 (Tri-Ahmd). It is seen that both, the learned adjudicating authority and the learned A.R., have relied on a decision in Clariant Chemicals (I) Ltd of CESTAT, Mumbai, which being an interim order, again has no precedential value. No contrary decision was relied on or produced before us. So, on this ground alone the denial of cenvat credit taken by the appellant, on Clearing and forwarding agent services based on ISD invoices issued by depots at Chennai and Cochin, is not tenable in law. Even otherwise, we....