2025 (2) TMI 670
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....GH COURT - HC (Judgement / Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 11-2-2025<br>W. A. NO. 289 OF 2025 - -<br>GST<br>THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A. K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. FOR THE PETITIONER : BY ADV.SRI.K.N.SREEKUMARAN BY ADV.SRI.P.J.ANILKUMAR (A-1768) BY ADV.SRI.S.JAFFERALI FOR THE RESPONDENT : BY SRI.V.GIRISH KUMAR, STANDING COUNSEL JUDGMENT Dr. A. K. J....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....en an opportunity of being heard while passing the impugned order. 3. The learned Single Judge, who considered the matter, found that the appellant had not appeared on the date fixed for hearing namely, 06.01.2025, and it was under those circumstances that the proper officer had proceeded to pass Ext.P6 impugned order. It was found, therefore, that the appellant could not allege a violation of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he show cause notice, the date by which the reply had to be submitted was indicated as 27.12.2024, and the personal hearing was fixed at 12.10 p.m. on 06.01.2025. As against this, Ext.P4 reply appears to have been sent by the appellant on 24.12.2024 and received by the respondent by 27.12.2024. Thereafter, during the period between 27.12.2024 and 06.01.2025, the appellant appears to have done noth....
TaxTMI