1982 (4) TMI 70

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nding Counsel for the Central Govt. against the order passed by the III Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The case mainly rests on the evidence of P.W. 2 to 5, P.W. 2 the Customs Officer deposed that he seized contraband articles from premises which is said to have been let out to one Kanthilal & Company. However the accused was arrested on 5-3-1974 though the seizure was on 4-3-1974. It is not ....