2025 (2) TMI 206

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ovember 2024, by which we declined to entertain the petition and relegated the Petitioner to avail the alternate remedy of an appeal by fulfilling the pre-deposit conditions. In paragraph 14, we recorded the statement of Mr. Mukhi, learned counsel for the Petitioner, that the Petitioner will institute an appeal within 30 days from today. After recording this statement, we directed the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal on merits without referring to the limitation issue. 3. Now, this review application has been filed on the grounds set out in paragraphs 4A to 4D of the review petition. 4. At the outset, the review petition must be supported by the Advocates Certificate provided under Chapter IV Rule 23 of the Bombay High Court....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aid Petition is required to be placed before the Divisional Bench." 6. From the above, it is evident that the certificate is not in terms of the certificate contemplated by Rule 23(iii) of Chapter IV of the Bombay High Court Rules. Such a certificate is required so that the Advocate who files the review petition must take responsibility for the grounds raised therein. 7. Even if the above defect is ignored, we are satisfied that no case is made out for the exercise of review jurisdiction. The Petitioner has instituted this review petition to once again argue the matter. Mr Mukhi did precisely the same. 8. The grounds of review now suggest that the statement of the Advocate was conditional to our waiving pre-deposit of 10%. It is fu....