Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

High Court Refuses to Quash 24-Year-Old FIR in Serious Fraud Case Despite Elderly Accused's Age and Trial Delays

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HC declined to quash 1999 FIR involving charges under IPC Sections 406/420/468/471/120B and tax laws. Despite the 24-year pendency and petitioner's age (71), the court found the allegations of forgery, breach of trust, and false documentation too serious for quashing. While acknowledging the constitutional right to speedy trial under Article 21 per Hussainara Khatoon precedent, HC noted only 5 of 17 prosecution witnesses had testified since charges were framed in 2021. Court directed expedited trial proceedings rather than quashing, finding insufficient grounds despite prolonged prosecution. Petition disposed of with instructions for timely conclusion of trial.....