Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (1) TMI 1445

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....penses of Rs.1,12,55,083/- + Rs.8,07,142/- (ST/185/2012) for the period 01.10.2002 to 18.04.2006; and demanding of service tax of Rs.1,18,85,704/- on export of services; the same was adjudicated vide Order No.3110/2011 dated 31.10.2011 confirming the duty demanded along with interest and penalties. Hence, these appeals. 2. Ms. Krati Singh, learned Counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are engaged in execution of the work and not mere consultancy and advice and therefore, cannot be taxed under the Head "Management Consultancy Services"; she submits that CESTAT, New Delhi in the case of appellants' themselves decided the issue, 2014 (8) TMI 227, in favour of the appellants holding that only the services in the nature of providing consultancy or advice for improving the business will be covered by the definition of "Management Consultancy Services" and not executionary type of services; Revenue challenged the order before Hon'ble High Court, who dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction; an appeal filed by the Department before Hon'ble Apex Court was withdrawn on monetary limits. She submits that Department cannot take a different stand in this case. She also s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 230 (Tri. - Hyd.) 4. Learned Counsel submits that the appellants incurred out of pocket expenditure on behalf of the clients; the same was recovered on actual basis; for the period prior to 18.04.2006, the appellants were not liable to pay service tax on the OPE; after the amendment in Section 67 of the Act and introduction of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, the appellants paid service tax on such OPE in accordance with Rule 5(1) of the Valuation Rules; the issue is no longer res integra in view of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's decision in the case of M/s Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats - 2013 (29) STR 9 (Del.) [affirmed by Hon'ble Apex Court 2018 (10) GSTL 401 (SC)], the issue of inclusion of reimbursement is no longer res integra. She further relies on the following cases : C.B.R.E. South Asia Pvt. Ltd. vs. C.C.E. & S.T. Adjudication, New Delhi, 2021 (51) G.S.T.L. 325 (Tri. - Del.), affirmed in 2021 (53) G.S.T.L. J60 (S.C.)] Indian Institute for Production Management vs. Commr. OF C. Ex., CUS. & S.T., BBSR-II, Orissa, 2021 (46) G.S.T.L. 55 (Tri. - Kolkata) Smt. Ritu Arora Versus CCE & S.T. Ludhiana, 2023 (11) TMI 113....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d debts the person engaged cannot be considered to be providing Management or Business Consultancy Services. Though the definition at Section 65(65) includes any service in connection with management of any organization, the scope of the definition gets restricted to services in relation to consultancy as is evident from the name given to the service and commercial understanding of the expression "Management or Business Consultancy." 6. In the case of services for complying with the laws of the country it has been specifically ruled in the case of Ernest and Young (supra) that the service cannot be covered by definition at Section 65(65), because such services are executory in nature and not in the nature of consultancy or advice. 8. We further find that CESTAT has been consistently holding that actual performance of the activities do not fall under Management Consultancy Service. Therefore, we find that the issue stands decided in favour of the appellants. 9. Coming to the issue of Export of Services, we find that Tribunal Ahmedabad Bench in the case of B A Research India Ltd. (Supra) held that: 8. We have considered the submissions made by the learned DR. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is not complete till they deliver the report. The report is delivered outside India and the same is used outside India. These facts also fortify the views taken hereinabove that the service provided by the appellants was export of service and I am inclined to them such taxable service as export of service and therefore not taxable." 10. From the above provision it is clear that the said services came under Rule 3(1)(2) (sic) of the Rules. It is very much clear that the performance of the service is not complete until the testing and analysis report is delivered to its client. In the present case, when such reports were delivered to the clients outside India it amounts to taxable service partly performed outside India. The performance of testing and analysing has no value unless and until it is delivered to its client and the service is to be complete when such report is delivered to its client. Thus, delivery of report to its client is an essential part of the service report was delivered outside India and same was used outside India. This is not the disputed fact. We hold that the respondent satisfied the conditions of Rule 3(2) and accordingly the respondents are eligib....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... classified as 'business support service' ("BSS") being services as a support to Ingenix's business. 8.4 Further, we find that as per the Rule 3(1)(iii) of Export of Services Rules, 2005, the services rendered by the appellant to Ingenix who is located outside India, fall under the „export of services‟ because there is no dispute with regard to receipt of foreign exchange also. Though, in the impugned order, impugned services rendered by the appellant have been classified as „Technical Testing and Analysis services‟, which according to us, do not fall in the definition of „Technical Testing and Analysis service‟ because the appellant is not undertaking any technical testing and analysis for the purpose of testing of drugs and preparations. The ld. Commissioner in para 31.1 of the impugned order has observed that the service of administration of drugs or clinical research or testing of drugs provided by hospitals to pharmaceutical companies do not get completed unless results were collated by the assessee in the desired format. The collation of reports in a desired (digital) format is a Data Management service which the depart....