Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1976 (12) TMI 60

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Duty "equal to the value charged by the brand name owners to the wholesale market". 2. The short facts are that the five per cent equity share capital of the petitioner company is owned by one Ciba-Geigy of India Ltd., formerly known as Ciba of India Ltd. On or about 24-3-1971, the agreement Annexure A, was entered into by the petitioner company with the said company Ciba-Geigy of India Limited under which the petitioners agreed to sell to the said buyers certain Urea formaldehyde resins and certain Melamine formaldehyde resins in accordance with the programme drawn by the seller and the buyer and the petitioners had agreed to supply and sell the same to the said buyers. Thereafter on or about 7-12-1971, an agreement was entered into bet....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....per the Act of 1975), the value to be determined is to be wholesale cash price for which an article of the like kind and quality is sold or is capable of being sold at the time of the removal of the article chargeable with duty from the factory or any other premises of manufacture or production for delivery at a place of manufacture or production, or if a wholesale market does not exist for such article at such place, at the nearest place where such market exists. Mr. Gandhi, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioners contended that by the impugned trade notice, an attempt was made by the department to fix the value for the purpose of Central Excise duty on a new standard different from the one laid down in the above mentioned Secti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to be the measure of the value of the goods for the purpose of excise. The second or subsequent price even though on wholesale-basis, is not material. If excise were levied on the basis on second or subsequent wholesale price, it would load the price with a post-manufacturing element, namely, selling cost and selling profit of the wholesale dealer. That would be plainly to the true nature of excise. Secondly, this would also violate the concept of the factory gate sale which is the basis of determination of value of the goods for the purpose of excise. There can, therefore, be no doubt that where a manufacturer sells the goods manufactured, by him in wholesale to a wholesale dealer at arms length and in the usual course of business, the who....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e very attempt which has been pulled down by the Supreme Court in the above-quoted case. We have, therefore, no hesitation in holding that the latter part of the Direction No. 2 namely, "equal to the value charged by the brand-name owners to the wholesale market" as put in blanket terms is ultra vires the authority of the Collector of Central Excise, who otherwise under Section 37(20) and Rule 232 of the Central Excise Rules is entitled to issue supplemental directions in the form of a trade notice and above power were fairly and frankly conceded even by Mr. Gandhi for the petitioners. 4. It is to be recalled here that the Atic Industries's case (supra) was a case of contract between the manufacturer and the seller commanding 50 per cent....